cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-14-2008, 09:46 PM   #11
pelagius
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,431
pelagius is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by il Padrino Ute View Post
Fair enough.

I was just under the assumption that science was supposed to be the primary reason for winning a Nobel Prize, rather than politics. Economics is a science with which I'm not very familiar, so perhaps he really is deserving of that prize.

I just like to taint things like that with my own view. It makes me feel better, ya know?
See, that's where you went wrong, thinking it was a science.

Krugman probaby benefited from the larger political landscape. No doubt the Swedes liked his politics. However, he didn't win for his recent work. He really doesn't do research anymore. He won for his work in the 80s. This isn't unusual. The prize in economics has always been given for work done 20-30 years ago. By that normal standard he holds up pretty well (his work on internationaal trade really was innovative). The most unusual thing is that he is a little young. Sure, there are some people I think are more deserving (I always want a financial economist to win (econometricians are okay too)) but I don't have a problem with the choice.

Last edited by pelagius; 10-14-2008 at 10:04 PM.
pelagius is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.