![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Art house films with real sex but not classified as porn? | |||
Immoral; porn by another name |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 66.67% |
Morally neutral |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 11.11% |
This is art; I don't believe in judging art as moral or not. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 22.22% |
Not relevant to me; I don't see anything over PG-13 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
![]() |
![]()
Films (usually made overseas) are becoming more prevalent that have real sex but are not considered porn because they don't show insertion and have plots and character development. Is this immoral? (Confidential poll.)
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|