List of important, controversial Mormon history titles

[SeattleUte]

Originally Posted by pelagius

It gets worse. I have read a fair amount of Paul and Margaret's work mostly in Dialogue articles. I have read more of Paul's work than her work. I can't say I am a big fan. I mean I do appreciate there intellectual contribution and that they are both very smart people. However (and its been a while), don't really remember finding their articles that insightful and careful. Still, it has been a while so I don't have a lot of specifics to offer and their work rightly deserves a more specific critique if I am going to be somewhat negative. I know this is not surprising given that I am such an apologist.

I think what you're trying to say is they're a little goofy, and I think that's right.