|
05-15-2007, 11:33 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: WA
Posts: 1,287
|
War Czar????
You have got to be kidding me, right?
What about the title of Commander-in-Chief? <Lincoln, FDR, Truman and Eisenhower roll over in grave> http://abcnews.go.com/ Also, I wonder what Gates thinks of this. Last edited by 8ballrollin; 05-15-2007 at 11:39 PM. |
05-16-2007, 03:56 PM | #2 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
I guess now that we have a "war czar," whose specific calling is to manage the "wars" in Iraq and Afghanistan, such war czar being so designated and appointed by President Bush, the one responsible for that misbegotten and mismanaged adventure in Iraq, that should silence those such as Waters and Archea who suggest that what is going on there is something other than a war.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
05-16-2007, 04:03 PM | #3 | |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Quote:
Bush has nobody to intervene in his abortion of a presidency. I imagine, in person, I would enjoy his company (the reason I say this, is I have met his uncle, and quite enjoyed his company at a little picnic. However, he has mismanaged his PR and the occupation.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
|
05-17-2007, 03:54 AM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,368
|
Quote:
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|