|
View Poll Results: Is unbelief a choice? | |||
yes | 14 | 73.68% | |
no | 5 | 26.32% | |
undecided | 0 | 0% | |
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-29-2008, 08:59 PM | #1 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Is unbelief a choice?
Confidential poll.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
02-29-2008, 09:12 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,431
|
channeling the bloggernacle or just coincidence?
http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2008/...ose-your-faith |
02-29-2008, 09:47 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,502
|
It seems to me that there were various circumstances in my life that led to the opportunity to make a choice, so it seems it was a bit of both. I voted yes, but I do think there are many people who never have opportunity to make an actual decision about whether they want to believe/not believe.
|
02-29-2008, 10:12 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 474
|
This is a thought provoking topic and rekindles memories of debating the relative merits of Free Will vs. Determinism; and in particular the fascinating dialogue between Erasmus and Luther. Gordon Rupp's book, "Luther and Erasmus: Free Will and Salvation" is an excellent treatise.
Determinists (Luther) would argue that the nature of the universe is such that free will is not possible under any conditions, and each action is caused by a particular prior cause. In Luther's view, fallen man can only imagine himself to be a free creature. Rupp summarizes Erasmus' free will position: "By free choice in this place we mean a power of the human will by which a man can apply himself to the things which lead to eternal salvation, or turn away from them." Advocates of Luther's position argue there is little or no choice whether or not to believe - especially as we grow older and expand our base of "prior causes". Obviously this topic is far too complicated to discuss in depth here - and I readily acknowledge there are many resident with wiser perspectives. However, it is intriguing to contemplate the premise that our ability to choose (i.e. free will) may be much more limited than previously assumed. Last edited by Requiem; 02-29-2008 at 10:17 PM. |
02-29-2008, 10:14 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,177
|
Faith is a spiritual gift.
|
02-29-2008, 10:19 PM | #6 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Supplies won't last. There are only 144,000.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
02-29-2008, 10:25 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Valencia CA
Posts: 1,384
|
|
02-29-2008, 11:30 PM | #8 |
Board Pinhead
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the basement of my house, Murray, Utah.
Posts: 15,941
|
__________________
"The beauty of baseball is not having to explain it." - Chuck Shriver "This is now the joke that stupid people laugh at." - Christopher Hitchens on IQ jokes about GWB. |
02-29-2008, 11:37 PM | #9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Down by the River in a Van
Posts: 216
|
|
02-29-2008, 11:42 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
|
Quote:
Interestgin stuff but I don't think that's what he is after. I think he means is unbeleif a choice like belief is a choice. IOW, unbbeleif is the natural state so the only choice is to believe, where you move from a natural condition to beleif. Here it might be better to comapre never-believed with believe as oppsoed to fomrerly-believed with beilieve. The first may be argued to be a non-choice and a choice, while the second may both be chocies. I could be wroing, and maybe he was trying to tee up luther vs. erasmus.
__________________
Sorry for th e tpyos. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|