03-19-2008, 05:01 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,371
|
Quick overview of seeding
-Note that I'm not a big believer in the anti-BYU conspiracy. I think it's mostly a lot of bunk.
Still, I wanted to point out some things about the seeding that, to me, seem sort of 'off'. -Based on straight-RPI seeding, BYU was the FIRST 7-seed (note that UNLV was actually the LAST 6-seed). A one-seed drop isn't that out of the ordinary (of the top-50 RPI teams, 5 appear to have not been seeded at all, and the largest disparity was a 3-seed drop (Kent State), while the largest increase was Purdue (+6). -Some claim that there were no 7-seeds available for BYU. Not true. The following seeds would play entirely Thursday/Saturday games (Note, I'm ONLY including 5-7 seeds): 7th seed in the West. 6th seed in the West. 5th seed in the East. -The following teams had an RPI lower than ours. I'll include their record, SOS & conference, for your information. Notre Dame, 24-7, 81, Big East West Virginia, 23-10, 45, Big East Oklahoma, 22-11, 13, Big12 USC, 21-11, 9, Pac10 Gonzaga, 25-7, 93, WCC Miami (FL), 21-10, 42, ACC Purdue, 24-8, 114, Big10 I don't think it surprising that any one of these teams were seeded ahead of BYU, but I think BYU has a better resume than several. -The ONLY team with an RPI-seed higher than BYU that was seeded lower was Kent State. I'll let everyone draw their own conclusions on this. Did FIVE of the teams with lower RPI's than BYU deserve higher seeds than BYU? Personally, I think West Virginia, Oklahoma, and USC likely did. You can make a case for Notre Dame & Miami. |
03-19-2008, 07:14 PM | #2 |
Board Pinhead
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the basement of my house, Murray, Utah.
Posts: 15,941
|
It looks like Dr. Hill did his job - again.
BYU really needs to win a few consecutive 1st round games in order to help itself get a higher seed. Getting bounced on the 1st day isn't doing the Cougars any good.
__________________
"The beauty of baseball is not having to explain it." - Chuck Shriver "This is now the joke that stupid people laugh at." - Christopher Hitchens on IQ jokes about GWB. |
03-19-2008, 07:19 PM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,371
|
Quote:
To me, it doesn't really matter - we're going to have to beat teams like A&M & UCLA if we want to go deep in the tourney regardless. Getting to the second round by beating a crappy team isn't really that impressive. |
|
03-19-2008, 07:25 PM | #4 | |
Board Pinhead
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the basement of my house, Murray, Utah.
Posts: 15,941
|
Quote:
Had BYU beaten Xavier last year and knocked off Syracuse before that, it would show the committee that BYU can play solid basketball and hold it's own against good competition. The only true crappy teams are the ones who are the 15th and 16th seeds.
__________________
"The beauty of baseball is not having to explain it." - Chuck Shriver "This is now the joke that stupid people laugh at." - Christopher Hitchens on IQ jokes about GWB. |
|
03-19-2008, 07:41 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,177
|
Quote:
It seems over the past five years or so, seedings are going away from RPI and closer to more standard computer rankings. I don't know if this is because the selection committee is using Sagarin, etc. or if they collectively come to an evaluation that is closer to computer rankings. A guy on CB has written some good stuff on this, recently. Someone should invite him over here. I've been busy with work and have slacked off on my analysis. RPI BYU 26, SOS 136 (7 seed) UNLV 24, SOS 71 (last sixth seed) My model BYU 31, SOS 136 (8 seed) UNLV 39, SOS 125 (10 seed) Sagarin BYU 30, SOS 138 (8 seed) UNLV 45, SOS 125 (12 seed) |
|
03-19-2008, 07:45 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,371
|
Quote:
Yeah - BYU's had chances in the past. Xavier was especially disappointing, although less so after they nearly took out Ohio State. Yeah, nearly all the teams in the tourney are pretty good. I probably should have used the term "Less Great" than crappy. |
|
03-19-2008, 07:51 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,817
|
2 of the 4 #7 seeds play on Thursday/Saturday...but I believe those all feed into a Friday/Sunday bracket don't they? So, that would not allow BYU to get a #7 seed for fear that they advance past the 2nd round.
On top of that, as you said, one number difference in seeding is not a big deal. I think BYU was seeded fairly. Now, if they had beaten UNLV and still got a #8 seed, then yes, they were not seeded fairly.
__________________
UteStar's words to live by: "I'm not about play-play, I'm really about business." Goatnapper: "UteStar is the only one who is not scum." |
03-19-2008, 07:52 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,371
|
Quote:
Once the seedings are set, they can look at it and set the regions accordingly. |
|
03-19-2008, 07:55 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,371
|
Quote:
The question as to 'fairness' isn't really about how we compared to last year. It's entirely possible that BYU, even though they had a better year this year, was stuck behind more other teams also having better years. It's also not really about the seed, according to RPI. The issue one could rightly have is the teams with RPI's lower than BYU's that got seeded above them. Based on what I posted above, I think it's an arguable issue, but don't find either argument all that convincing. In other words, I don't think BYU got the behind-the-woodshed-naked-with-a-rubber-hose screw-job that some fans think they got. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|