cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-08-2008, 02:40 PM   #1
exUte
Senior Member
 
exUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,326
exUte can only hope to improve
Default Help me understand the difference between

what these pastors are advocating and what the likes of Rev. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton preach? Or even the AA churches that invite their candidates to speak from their pulpits?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...702460_pf.html
__________________
Ohbama - The Original Bridge to Nowhere
exUte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2008, 02:42 PM   #2
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

maybe the church should join up in this.

I'm willing to lose the tax exemption if that's what it takes to get members to get behind the GOP platform.
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2008, 02:45 PM   #3
exUte
Senior Member
 
exUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,326
exUte can only hope to improve
Default You didn't help me understand

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeWaters View Post
maybe the church should join up in this.

I'm willing to lose the tax exemption if that's what it takes to get members to get behind the GOP platform.
the differences. Why does the IRS allow one, but not the other?
__________________
Ohbama - The Original Bridge to Nowhere
exUte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2008, 02:48 PM   #4
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

For one, it's not clear to me that Jackson and Sharpton are actually eccelesiastical leaders, in church of a specific church, or that they preach over the church pulpit regarding support for specific candidates. Just because one is an ordained minister doesn't mean one is in charge of a church. Just because one is a Bishop in the Mormon church doesn't mean one is in charge of a Mormon congregation, that could have passed many years ago.
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2008, 02:51 PM   #5
exUte
Senior Member
 
exUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,326
exUte can only hope to improve
Default Jackson and Sharpton don't have congregations they are over?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeWaters View Post
For one, it's not clear to me that Jackson and Sharpton are actually eccelesiastical leaders, in church of a specific church, or that they preach over the church pulpit regarding support for specific candidates. Just because one is an ordained minister doesn't mean one is in charge of a church. Just because one is a Bishop in the Mormon church doesn't mean one is in charge of a Mormon congregation, that could have passed many years ago.
What say you about the AA churches inviting Dem presidential candidates to speak to their congregations, but not Republicans?
__________________
Ohbama - The Original Bridge to Nowhere
exUte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2008, 02:53 PM   #6
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by exUte View Post
What say you about the AA churches inviting Dem presidential candidates to speak to their congregations, but not Republicans?
What do you say about Mormons preaching against gay rights, but not preaching for them, in their churches?

Nothing of course.

Point is, different people have different politics, and each side is willing to inject politics into their religion as far as it doesn't punish them financially.
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2008, 02:55 PM   #7
exUte
Senior Member
 
exUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,326
exUte can only hope to improve
Default Jackson and Sharpton are ministers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeWaters View Post
What do you say about Mormons preaching against gay rights, but not preaching for them, in their churches?

Nothing of course.

Point is, different people have different politics, and each side is willing to inject politics into their religion as far as it doesn't punish them financially.
Should any of their ministerial activities be tax exempt?

BTW......there are dems and republicans that don't support gay marriage, so how would that be political?
__________________
Ohbama - The Original Bridge to Nowhere
exUte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2008, 02:58 PM   #8
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by exUte View Post
Should any of their ministerial activities be tax exempt?

BTW......there are dems and republicans that don't support gay marriage, so how would that be political?
The church is politically involved as any group in the country when it comes to gay marriage in CA. Should the tax exemption be lost?

Personally I think it is kind of sad that gay marriage is the most important issue that the church has ever faced in its history, yet it is not willing to lose its tax exemption over it. Very sad commentary.
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.