View Single Post
Old 09-25-2008, 06:42 PM   #4
TripletDaddy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
TripletDaddy can only hope to improve
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Indy Coug View Post
That's not the source of their concern. What is of interest is when insurance companies buy mortgage-backed securities are they able to properly assess the quality of the asset and appropriately model and manage its associated risk.

Insurance companies don't hold much in the way of equities; their portfolios are pretty conservative. Mortgage-backed securities are an attractive investment option for insurance companies given their alleged low risk, rate of return and relative predictibility of the timing of the cashflows.

Since MBS represent a sizeable portion of an insurance company's portfolio, it leaves them very exposed if they end up being significantly less secure an investment than originally believed. This going to cause a significant shakeup in the industry in terms of investment strategy, ERM and cashflow testing.
on a serious note, i assumed that most purchasers of mortgage-backed securities were hedge and mutual funds, as opposed to insurance companies.
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

"Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte
TripletDaddy is offline   Reply With Quote