View Single Post
Old 09-25-2008, 06:07 PM   #3
Indy Coug
Senior Member
 
Indy Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between Iraq and a hard place
Posts: 7,569
Indy Coug is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TripletDaddy View Post
Here is a SWAG, without consulting any actuaries:

In the future, banks should not lend money to people who do not have the income to support the payments.

Hey, that's just me, though. I'm no professional. It will be really interesting to see what the actuaries come up with after months of analysis.
That's not the source of their concern. What is of interest is when insurance companies buy mortgage-backed securities are they able to properly assess the quality of the asset and appropriately model and manage its associated risk.

Insurance companies don't hold much in the way of equities; their portfolios are pretty conservative. Mortgage-backed securities are an attractive investment option for insurance companies given their alleged low risk, rate of return and relative predictibility of the timing of the cashflows.

Since MBS represent a sizeable portion of an insurance company's portfolio, it leaves them very exposed if they end up being significantly less secure an investment than originally believed. This going to cause a significant shakeup in the industry in terms of investment strategy, ERM and cashflow testing.
Indy Coug is offline   Reply With Quote