Quote:
Originally Posted by woot
Sure, but that's not relevant. The guy should have had less of an attitude, but that's equally irrelevant. His attitude does not justify the cop's illegal assault.
|
Jumping to conclusions again, aren't you?
What makes it an "
illegal assault?" You assume both that it was assault, and that it was illegal.
Why is his attitude irrelevant? Can't attitude convey a threat? If it does, can't an officer take proper steps to protect himself? Can attitude undermine authority? If it does, can the officer not reassert authority?