Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelBlue
I'd put him second. He probably was more important as far as the direction the show took over time. The fact that nearly everyone thinks he was actually a cast member is evidence that his work was very strong. Baldwin was also important though, at times being the only funny thing about SNL during some rough years. When it comes down to who is funnier (leave your politics out of it and search your hear ilPad) we're talking about a purely subjective matter and I personally have to go with Baldwin. I think Martin was also hilarious.
Another all time great host is Walken.
|
It has nothing to do with politics. I just don't think he is entertaining. I didn't like any of his movies or any of the SNL stuff before I learned of his politics.
BTW, I haven't liked SNL since the Eddie Murphy years.