[il Padrino Ute]

I believe the best course of actions would be for government to stay out of the marriage business. Let the religious organizations handle marriage and the government do the civil unions. There really is no difference, is there?

Would the gay community be ok with something like that?

I often wonder if those who are against gay marriage object more to it being called "marriage". It's a silly objection, but I'm guessing that if there were a random poll taken in which the question was simply "What is marriage?", a rather substantial majority would define it as man and woman.