Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Coug
That is precisely the point. Bush assured us all that he wouldn't violate constitutional liberties. Then he actually had his legal advisors outline manners in which he could do exactly what he told all of us he wouldn't do. It is shameful.
What do you mean "what's going on with executive orders these days?" That is a pretty broad question.
Obama hasn't "undone Clinton era welfare reforms". Rather, temporary spending has been authorized, some of which will go to those on welfare or who need welfare.
FYI: Obama opposes the Fairness Doctrine. Heck- who needs the Fairness Doctrine when the top conservative commentator spends his time proving he is the de facto leader of the SWCP rather than Steele?
|
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q...U5MTk2YTIxNTQ=
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matthew...romise-funding
Quote:
|
The CNN anchor then reminded her viewers of Obama's public financing promise: “One year ago, he made a promise. He pledged to accept public financing, to work with the Republican nominee to ensure that they both operated within those limits. And then it became clear to Senator Obama and his campaign that he was going to be able to raise on his own far more cash than he would get with public financing. So, Obama went back on his word. He broke his promise...”
|
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/
There's all of this to talk about and YOU bring up Limbaugh and Bush?