Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeWaters
In your desire to criticize Jones, you've committed the error that you accuse Walch of committing: not double-checking.
http://journalof911studies.com/volum...urleyEtal2.pdf
Amazing that because firefighters did not see explosives, there were no explosives!
Does that count as rigorous thinking? |
LOL.
Piecing together the exact sequence of events of the collapse is a forensic exercise. The NIST letter admits that they don't have a perfect understanding of 100% of the details (which is to be expected). Jones twists this around to imply that they "don't know why the towers collapsed." But the overwhelming body of evidence is that the towers collapsed due to the impact of the planes and the subsequent fires.
BTW, the NIST is only one of many groups that studied the collapse.