Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Lebowski
It had been there for about one day.
|
Seeing as how none of us have actually seen the bike, or the condition it was in (they claim it had two flat tires and looked beat up) I think it's a little absurd to immediately jump to the conclusion that it was obvious that it hadn't been abandoned. Maybe it really did look battered and abandoned.
I really cannot understand why everyone reads this article and suddenly has all the facts, knows that they're liars and thieves, and is ready to exact the maximum amount of punishment allowable. They made a mistake. I have no idea whether or not they took a bike that was obviously not abandoned or not, and I'm pretty sure nobody here knows that either. There are simply not enough facts in that article to be meriting this kind of reaction.