Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeWaters
What I have said is that AA appears to be entering law with some level of naivete, which offends him.
Moreover in the past, I have expressed some skepticism of his course to him in private. It's not like he is suddenly discovering that I am skeptical.
Most of what I have said applies to the subject generally, relating my experience and observations. Such as unhappy LDS lawyers, big-firm experiences, pitfalls of debt, choices not based on self-derived values, etc.
|
I never said I was offended. I said you were going out of your way to be rude and insulting. That doesn't make for constructive dialogue.
You say you should have said less. I wish you would have said more. I would have gladly considered any insights you would have offered. All you had to tell me was how naive I was. I was far closer to being offended by you withholding what you could have told me than by saying what you did tell me.