Quote:
Originally Posted by Levin
The point is the same point with any prosecution of liars, cheats, and frauds. It's because they broke the rules, and those charged with enforcing those rules have a duty to prosecute those who break them.
Should the feds have ignored Al Capone b/c his misdeeds were in the past and he had left the crime business?
Your logic is nuts. There actually is no logic there but some misplaced emotion for a bully. Maybe you take PEDs; don't know. But your devotion to Lance, and dumb arguments in his favor, are odd.
|
You're an asshole.
Not that you deserve a response, but I have no reason to ever take PED's and my poor performances should back that up.
My logic is simple. The violations were not caught, if they existed, at the time of competition. They are malum prohibitum. There is nothing inherently wrong with taking a substance to compete with the others except some rules say so.
The laws allegedly violated are hybrid, sophisticated laws that do not protect or benefit society. My logic is to enforce laws that matter.
Rape, murder, theft matter.
Some of these hyper-sensitive laws do not. If you catch Al Capone at age 99, I really don't care. I don't have the high sense of blood lust you do.
Fuck you and the horse you rode in on.