Quote:
Originally Posted by pelagius
That's certainly true. So it is fair to say that the first vision implications are incomplete in that regard. However, I mean it is not clear the Joseph Smith would have rejected the trinity based on the first vision. Clearly by 1838 he would have but what about 1832?
|
That's a good point. Why couldn't God be one person, yet still appear as two? Doesn't the NT talk about Jesus, standing on the right hand of God, or something like that (my Bible bashing days were long ago)? That scripture didn't have much effect on the Christian world. JS's vision was no different.