Quote:
Originally Posted by woot
Oh I actually don't find it terribly significant, and my "apologist version" would probably be satisfactory were I looking to actually explain it.
|
I don't understand how antis decide only one possible interpretation flows from an ambiguous set of data points.
It is perplexing a bit why Joseph firstly only mentions one personage. And it is certainly possible one could conclude that he saw only one and only made it up. However, if one is in the business of visions and believes in them, do you believe that person would go about changing the vision? Now, of course you could argue he never had a vision.
However, it seems clear that JS did proclaim he had seen two personages and the fusnik material shows a lot of rambling and confusion.