View Single Post
Old 07-28-2016, 06:37 PM   #13
ChinoCoug
Senior Member
 
ChinoCoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
ChinoCoug is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post
No. I am looking at some economic papers from certain schools. The slow-down is not correlated to the ACA.

Conversely, healthcare costs have often risen faster than inflation. What drives healthcare costs has not been understood and still isn't. It is a much more complex equation than post hoc ergo propter hoc.

The slowing costs is more tied to the fact that Medicare is freezing payments, which insurance companies follow, than actual costs being frozen. Additionally, people were poor during the 2009 through 2015 period, so people were unable to spend more. There are plenty of citations that show the ACA is not responsible for any slow down in costs.
There have been plenty economic slowdowns in history with no corresponding reductions in health care costs.

Plus you're still attributing a 40% reduction in the uninsured rate to measure error, which is preposterous, to say the least.
__________________
太初有道
ChinoCoug is offline   Reply With Quote