Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea
Indy, why don't you add something other than just set us up for an attack?
Elder Oaks and the view of Professor Mauss are valuable to me. It seems like a reasonable standard. Apparently you find some of us ridiculous for trying a different path.
|
Who's attacked who in this thread? I asked a simple question. I made no derisive comments about the quote included in the intial post (in fact, I basically agree with it). I made no derisive comments about you or SEIQ in this thread.
Even after being smacked around by SEIQ in this thread several times, I've tried to respond with level-headedness.
I just wanted to understand what an "alternate voice" was, because the term in and of itself is extremely vague. The eventual linkage of Elder Oaks talk was appreciated and I at least have a better understanding now of what an "alternate voice" is than I did an hour ago.
I don't intend to take any more of this thread's space. I got the answer I was looking for and will watch from the rafters from this point forward.