Quote:
Originally Posted by Chapel-Hill-Coug
Let's see if this mental midget can explain it slowly enough so that you can understand.
#1: I predict scores better than you.
#2: You're ahead in the standings.
#3: Mike clearly stated that the reason he introduced the meaningless stat is to avoid so many ties.
#4: That objective has clearly failed and the meaningless stat is now conditioning the standings in and of itself.
#5: A few of us who GET IT are pointing out this shortcoming in the system so that Mike will realize it.
This is not as big a deal as you're making it out to be. I realize that you must insult someone in every post, so I won't call you out on that. But don't make it personal please. Go back to insulting nerds generally every chance you get. You don't need to zero in on one person.
|
Just so everyone has a clear understanding. Although I am whining about this too, I am not taking it nearly as serious as Chapel Hill is.