Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueK
So let's throw out most BCS teams then. Not many of them have won national chamipionships since WW2 either, if that's your standard. The problem I have with this blanket labeling is that it gives fans the idea that every team from a BCS conference is automatically better than any team not in a BCS league. This season is proving how false that idea is. You may know and care about BYU's history and tradition, but if we were to play a bad BCS conference team back east like Duke or Vanderbilt, how much do you want to bet you could poll the fans of those teams and 80-90% would think they should kick our butts? That's all due to BCS media hype, mostly from ESPN.
|
Who cares what fans think?
And nobody has ever claimed that any BCS school is automatically better than a non BCS school.
Your hypo is ridiculous. We were favored both against UCLA and Washington, so there goes your argument.