Quote:
|
Originally Posted by UtahDan
We aren't happy with his answer of "you have to trust me." Well folks, that was exactly what we decided to do when we voted for him.
|
I agree in part to what you say.
If I voted for Bush, I also voted for the actions and appointments which I anticipated that he would make while in this term of office. I've got to live with the consequences of my actions - that's fine.
But I am still entitled to question his decisions, just as a major stockholder is entitled to that same privelege of the company in which he/she invests.
Is it too much to ask for someone to have at least a little experience on the bench before rising to the highest court in the land? Seriously, give me anything that has to do with interpreting the law - judge on the high school mock trial team, I don't care.
Every appointment has an attached agenda - I'm curious what we are dealing with here.