View Single Post
Old 07-02-2007, 06:17 PM   #23
Indy Coug
Senior Member
 
Indy Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between Iraq and a hard place
Posts: 7,569
Indy Coug is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Requiem View Post
I don't disagree that bishops are generally good men who desire to serve faithfully. What is troubling for these sisters (and frankly me) is the inconsistent standards of discipline. Does the handbook have specific disciplinary guidelines for certain behaviors - in this case intercourse vs. petting? I would dare say that if every single LDS member guilty of petting was brought before a Disciplinary Council, it would clog the system and be a horrible burden for all involved.
I'd rather not have "mandatory sentencing", so I'm willing to live with the inconsistency in discipline that exists from person to person.

I would submit that it's very likely the problem isn't strictly due to intercourse vs petting, but a lot of other mitigating factors that takes into account more than the immoral act itself; thus it's too complex for an apples to apples.

Last edited by Indy Coug; 07-02-2007 at 06:21 PM.
Indy Coug is offline   Reply With Quote