View Single Post
Old 05-09-2007, 04:20 AM   #3
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pelagius View Post
I don't think I have been paying enough attention lately to the threads to comment decisively on whether people are employing a lot of a proof texts. However, I do agree with you more generally. We, as a people and religion, employ proof texts quite frequently. Of course, as you pointed out in your comment, we are not alone in the use of proof texts. Another famous historical example is Augustine's use of Romans 5:12 as a proof text for the doctrine of original sin (If I remember right, he based it off a poor or incorrect translation from the Latin Vulgate).

I think my earliest memory of Family Home Evening involves the use of proof texts. Specifically, using Exekiel 37:15-17 as a proof text. Of course, we have lots of other proof texts as well. Jeremiah 1:5 as a proof text for the doctrine of pre-existence and Amos 3:7 as a proof text for the role of prophets come to mind. Regardless, of whether a proof text is accurate or not I find them troubling in many ways. In other words, even if Amos 3:7 is an accurate reflection of what a prophet does and correlates highly with our modern doctrine of the role of prophets, I still worry about using it as a proof text. When we use it as a proof text, we usually don't ask questions about the text and I think we at least implicitly lead people (ourselves) to start viewing scriptures in isolation removed from their larger context and narrative. Thus we lose the chance to learn or try to discover what the author (often a prophet) was trying to teach his/her audience. For example, I think we need to ask questions like the following for the call narrative found in Jeremiah 1:4-10:
  • What do we learn about the LORD and what do we learn about Jeremiah in these verses?
  • Why does the LORD mention Jeremiah's pre-birth call? Is it really to tell Jeremiah and us about the doctrine of a pre-existant state?
  • Why does the LORD touch the mouth of Jeremiah? Is the touching of the mouth somehow related to why the Lord mentions Jeremiah's pre-birth call? How are these narrative elements related? How does each of them affect our understand of the narrative? How do these elements affect our understanding of the relationship between God and Jeremiah and God and his people?
  • Why are call narratives similar? Are the similarities important? How is Isaiah's call narrative similar and different than Jeremiah's?
Probably, not the world's most insightful questions, but hopefully they illustrate my point.
Illustrates my point better than I could, of course, you are resident intellectual/finance nerd, so one could expect nothing less.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote