Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleeping in EQ
To the degree that that is true it is because Indy has pulled one over on you. He's tried to make the post about me instead of about any significant issue. That intent is evident in his first post, in which tried to make the discussion about my definition (a classic red herring). He could have read the articles. He could have offered something substantive. Indy has been operating out of his usual playbook.
|
All I can tell you is that you wildly misunderstood a very, very, very simple question. If you had just humored me with an answer right away, instead of going off on wild paranoid rantings about what you THOUGHT I was going to do, this could have all been avoided. I even stated later on in the thread I basically agreed with the points made, even though I tend to agree with Jay about the general defensive tone that permeated the piece.
Don't pin this one on me, this is all of your own making.