Quote:
Originally Posted by SeattleUte
What is this supposed to mean?
|
Your ad hominem attack by stating "nobody ever argues that" excepting you idiot morons here on CG and CB. If in court, you would not always attack the listener.
That's the shtick. BTW, it doesn't intimidate.
I imagine if I paid you your 600 dollars per hour I would get a more polished argument.
Of course, the Supreme Court will not decide whether something is moral or honorable, just allowable under our laws. And those who once disallowed it, may have done so under personal idiosyncratic predelictions, not under some discernible legal standard.
Resorting to "Texas" as being incapable of reasoned argument is beneath you. You'd be up in arms if somebody accused another person that "black persons" couldn't decide matters civilly. And I would to.
There are very scholarly works on death penalty, a fact of which you are well-aware. And many analogies are made therein.