View Single Post
Old 11-30-2006, 09:30 PM   #25
SeattleUte
 
SeattleUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
SeattleUte has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
I think you are misunderstanding my point. Agnosticism means that you simply don't claim to know one way or the other if there is a God. Atheism means you firmly believe there is no God. Atheism implies a leap of logic in my opinion (how can one definitively prove there is no God?). That's all I am saying.

Furthermore, no one ever claimed it was religous bigotry. Go back and read NS's post.

Relax, buddy.
Actually, I think there's not a lot of difference between agnostics and atheists. Lebowski, I love you man, but you are reflecting a common misunderstanding of atheists. Atheists who have given any thought to their belief system are really just what have been known since ancient Greek times as "materialists." You see this reflected over and over again in modern writings of atheists. Many in fact just call themselves materialists. A couple of the founders of this outlook are Democritus and Epicurus.

Atheists or materialists don't have anyting like "faith" in the absense of God. What they believe is that anything you can't perceive with your senses is of no account. In fact they do practice a complete absense of faith; it's a discipline. They don't believe that "spirituality" is anyting other than emotion, until their senses tell them otherwise, that is. If they were to experience anything like Joseph Smith's "First Vision" they'd believe in God without having to adjust their basic outlook one whit.

Democritus and Epicurus are enormously underrated in their importance to Western culture. They are the true fathers of the scientific method. Aristotle and Plato are much more revered because they were the first humans to articulate a dichotomy between the carnal body and the soul, and the early Christians and later middle ages Christians incorporated their philsophies wholesale into Christianity; Plato even much influenced Paul's development of the idea of an atonement. But Epicurus dismissed his rough contemporary Plato as spinnr of fantasies.

Again, I refer everyone to the magnificent epic poem "On the Nature of Things" also called "The Way Things Are" for a brilliant and beautiful articulation of this outlook.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be.

—Paul Auster

Last edited by SeattleUte; 11-30-2006 at 09:33 PM.
SeattleUte is offline   Reply With Quote