Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeWaters
I should have continued reading before posting. Wickman continues:
So they allow the a la carte approach. Seems to be a narrow legalistic approach. God disapproves of "bundle" but a la carte is ok.
One man's bundle could be another man's a la carte.
|
This is what's called sophistry--saying things in a way that borrows jargon from fields that employ reason to justify what is just subjective bias or belief. What this smug yewt needs is to have one of his kids turn out gay. That would knock him off his high horse. I can hear the General Conference intonation as he says these empty words.