View Single Post
Old 01-13-2009, 09:29 PM   #18
BlueK
Senior Member
 
BlueK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,368
BlueK is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ute4ever View Post
I don't mean to sound cheeky, but I don't understand why this would lead anyone to believe that the books were not written by Matthew, Mark, Luke, or John. They are four different people, each with a different perspective, who I assume were familiar with what had been written previously, and sought to add to that. For example, my dad, my brother, my daughter, and my BFF would each give a different account of who I am and what I did with my life.
In none of them does the author ever mention himself by name, so then we're left with believing the tradition or not. The tradition could be wrong. After all, there was plenty of fraudulent stuff written and assigned an author's name for the purpose of giving it credibility. It doesn't matter much to me who the actual authors were, nor that the accounts differ. If I were a literalist evangelical who believed in biblical infallibility then it would make a difference. It shouldn't matter to LDS however.

Last edited by BlueK; 01-13-2009 at 09:41 PM.
BlueK is offline   Reply With Quote