Thread: The Clintons
View Single Post
Old 09-09-2008, 11:54 PM   #5
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BarbaraGordon View Post
Bill's hidden away somewhere. He and Obama do not get along at all.

Hillary is out on the trail, trying to salvage what's left of the Clintons' good name. She's supposed to be drumming up support for Obama, but she's in an awfully awkward position.

1. If she doesn't take Palin on and point out all the ways in which Palin (allegedly) doesn't represent women's interests, Hillary doesn't look like she's really "fully invested" (sorry) in the Obaman cause. And, worse, if Obama loses the election because of poor support among women, the Clintons will be regarded as having lost the Democrats the election by unnecessarily dragging out the primary and splintering the party. They really don't want to risk that accusation.

2. On the other hand, if she tackles Palin head on, she appears to be cannibalizing one of her own - a strong, successful female leader. There are women who believe that women have an inherent obligation to protect and support one another; and these women would be disappointed by Hillary attacking one of the sisterhood. Plus, suppose Hillary does speak up and demonizes all the ways in which Palin differs from Hillary's beliefs, emphasizing that Palin is pro-life, pro-lots-of-babies, evangelical, and ultra-social-conservative. In doing so Hillary risks alienating the moderate American women who identify with those values but may yet be leaning toward Obama.

Anyway, I can't remember what my point was but that's what's up with the Clintons last I heard.
Doesn't he have an intern who needs instruction on the finer usages of cigars?
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote