Quote:
Originally Posted by UtahDan
C'mon Cali, if marriage is not one man and one women, then the numbers are totally, totally arbitrary. I go agree with your goat example because that is not a person. But can you really articulate why two men should be able to marry and not three men and 4 women?
|
Because the concept of one man one woman in a marriage is just as easily viewed as one person marrying one person. The total number of participants in the marriage is identical in both scenarios. Why do you assume logically that changing the characteristics of the people involved in the marriage necessitates allowing a change in the number of participants too?