Quote:
Originally Posted by Indy Coug
If that's the role you want for the official Church Historian, then what need is there for the church to even appoint one in the first place? It's not like there aren't ample other "unofficial" historians already filling that role.
|
God commanded the Church to. Obedience is better than sacrifice, GA Son. 
The official church historian would have access to far more information that the unofficial historians - either apologist or critic. That is the most compelling reason, IMO. If the Church wishes to guard its archives more closely than a Laurel guards her canned peaches on prom night, methinks having a legitimate academic to shed some light on what is within is helpful.
__________________
She had a psychiatrist who said because I didn't trust the water system, the school system, the government, I was paranoid," he said. "I had a psychiatrist who said her psychiatrist was stupid."
|