Thread: On Stars
View Single Post
Old 02-11-2008, 05:50 PM   #47
SoCalCoug
Senior Member
 
SoCalCoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,059
SoCalCoug is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jay santos View Post
There's a major disconnect with the #63 and #80 then. Because I don't believe our recruiting has ever been that low in the past, has it?
I would agree that there appears to be a disconnect. I would disagree if you say that the 2008 class is not that great. It appears that compared with classes going back to 2002, it's very good.

If the star rankings are accurate, then we are getting much better athletes on the whole than we have been getting.

Therefore, Bronco's doing a very good job at recruiting.

It also seems that whether it's because they're better at evaluating talent, or better at getting production out of their players, Bronco and BYU have done a very good job the last 2 years, relying primarily on lower-rated players to propel the team to two top-15 rankings.

Or maybe the stars just don't matter as much as you think, like Bronco says.
__________________
Get your stinking paws off me, you damned, dirty Yewt!

"Now perhaps as I spanked myself screaming out "Kozlowski, say it like you mean it bitch!" might have been out of line, but such was the mood." - Goatnapper

"If you want to fatten a pig up to make the pig MORE delicious, you can feed it almost anything. Seriously. The pig is like the car on Back to the Future. You put in garbage, and out comes something magical!" - Cali Coug
SoCalCoug is offline   Reply With Quote