Quote:
Originally Posted by woot
I thought it was an obvious point. Perhaps rather than claiming bias, which seems to be the result of nothing but your bias, why not actually explain what you mean and why you think Fusnik's comment remains valid after knowing that the PoGP version came after the accounts mentioning only 1 personage?
As a matter of fact, Darwin didn't make edits to his journals, at least not in the way you're thinking. That wouldn't have made any sense. He spent the rest of his life interpreting his data, not changing his data to fit his interpretations. Also, category error.
|
Does only mentioning one personage mean that he only claimed to see just Christ, but didn't see the Father? Yes, the omission may be a little puzzling, but is it really that significant?
Frankly, this early account is very rough, even a bit rambling, like it was done in a hurry.