Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea
The real answer is none of us know a damn thing about who is to blame. Some will want to blame Clinton; others will want to blame Bush. It sounds as if this incident is the result of military intelligence and judgment, the failure to identify the potential threat from electric running submarines. Why all angles aren't examined is beyond me.
How can a President know if his advisers or military personnel are smart enough?
|
I'm not sure Bush ever wanted to be around people who would disagree with him.
Gates is too little too late. If he had had a few more Gates in 2001, we might not be in the mess we're in.
Of course, I'm not saying Clinton was any different.
The point is that China will be coddled, now, and next year, and the year after. It doesn't matter if it is Romney, or Clinton or anyone else.