Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea
Most of that is very basic, do you really think we should start there?
Blomberg is a literary critic, not an NT scholar I thought, like Ehrman or David Parker out of England.
Do you like Mark Goodacre for the NT and Q theories?
|
you're thinking of Bloom (jewish agnostic). Blomberg is an evangelical NT scholar.
I don't think he should start out by studying Q and documentary hypothesis in depth (esp. since latter is becoming passé). He should read primers explain what they are.
I like Raymond Brown for NT, but he's kinda dry.