Quote:
Originally Posted by Detroitdad
1. State substantive/federal procedural
2. Cosmetics queen who had something to do with a promoter contract? or something like that.
3. COugjunkie always thought that Bowers v. Hardwick was draconian. Besides what if states came up with laws forbidding floating? At least now we have Lawrence v. Texas.
4. Holmes and Judge Andrews got into a pissing match and gave us proximate cause.
5. I'd rather talk about the difference between perversion and perverter, but IIRC, reversion is retained by O and happens automatically upon some event, reverter must be exercised by O. (I suck at property).
That is the non-google version. And the post-bar I forgot everything I ever learned version.
|
Man, you guys paid far too much attention in law school. I would have got #3 right, but only because CJ is that kind of a guy.