Quote:
Originally Posted by BYU71
No we come to a different conclusion. I said I could be persuaded. "No, you're not right" is not a persuasive position.
It maybe justice all right. I just said there are inequities. I will concede to the thought there isn't a better way to do it.
|
I thought I explained, albeit perhaps not persuasively, in the rest of myh post. I take it you didn't like it?
You apprenetly assume a different result is an inequity. You also assume the only distinction between cases is a different judge. This is a faulty assumption, as each case is highly unique. When you use the term inequity do you mean in an absolute sense or in a legal sense within our system?