American sexual behavior
 

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pub...-370/ad362.htm

CDC report.

What is the deal...
 

with the "something else" category for males sexual orientation. Not hetero-, bi-, or homosexual. Am I missing something here?

I've tried not to let my imagination run too far with this one. But that was a sizable chunk (3.9%) that fit into that category.

think Wyoming. and sheep.

I heard on the radio about a study on bisexuality. The result of this study was that there is no such thing as male bisexuality. They did tests where they hooked up a sensor to a very sensitive part of the male anatomy, and then showed three groups of men (professed heterosexuals, professed homosexuals, and professed bisexuals) different videos to see what actually turned them on.

The men who called themselves bisexuals generally turned out to be homosexuals, who were perhaps not completely out of the closet.

There has been a similar study done with women which concluded that bisexuality in women is legitimate (i.e., the women appeared to be turned on by both men and women). I have no idea where they hooked up the sensors for the women's study. :twisted:

This is what I don't understand. . .
 

Since we all know -- by listening to all the experts over on CougarBoard -- that homosexuality is simply a choice made by people seeking a promiscuous lifestyle, how could any of the men be aroused by provocative pictures of other men?

You guys have more knowledge of this than I
 

but thinking about where a man sticks his unit, especially in a place not designed for it, doesn't really do it for me

I cannot relate.

Did you read the part that something like 40% have had anal sex (I think among heterosexual men with their female partners).

why use that
 

when you have a perfectly good orifice designed for a certain purpose.

You can create fistulas by that mechanis, which can lead to sepsis, or risk thereof.

We are a group of weird whacked out people.