cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board

cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board (http://www.cougarguard.com/forum/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.cougarguard.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Gun Control Debate on the Seas (http://www.cougarguard.com/forum/showthread.php?t=25944)

Snowcat 04-30-2009 09:02 PM

Gun Control Debate on the Seas
 
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30501853?GT1=43001

il Padrino Ute 04-30-2009 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snowcat (Post 304542)

Are there not Federal Maritime Marshals - similar to the Sky Marshals that fly in airlines? If not, does anyone know why?

MikeWaters 04-30-2009 09:24 PM

I thought the policy on dealing with pirates was "grab your ankles."

If Somalia was more sophisticated they would merely just make a floating toll booth. Sort of like what our govt. does with us.

Tex 04-30-2009 09:50 PM

The waters are not safe. Biden says stay off of subways and airplanes.

This is a secret plot by the environmentalist wackos to make everyone walk.

MikeWaters 04-30-2009 11:22 PM

Biden is America's crazy uncle, who has against all odds, found himself one heartbeat away from the presidency.

Cali Coug 05-01-2009 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by il Padrino Ute (Post 304543)
Are there not Federal Maritime Marshals - similar to the Sky Marshals that fly in airlines? If not, does anyone know why?

2 reasons:

1. Insurance companies won't insure vessels (or only will for exorbitant amounts) if they have weapons on board in that area of the world, because the insurance company doesn't want to see an escalation of violence that leads to destruction of the ship and/or cargo (which they are insuring). If the vessel is hijacked for ransom, and later released, the insurance company doesn't have to pay to cover the ransom or the cost of the goods or the vessel.

2. The company that owns the vessel and/or the company contracting for the shipment of goods doesn't want an escalation of violence that could result in destruction of the vessel and/or cargo.

MikeWaters 05-01-2009 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cali Coug (Post 304548)
2 reasons:

1. Insurance companies won't insure vessels (or only will for exorbitant amounts) if they have weapons on board in that area of the world, because the insurance company doesn't want to see an escalation of violence that leads to destruction of the ship and/or cargo (which they are insuring). If the vessel is hijacked for ransom, and later released, the insurance company doesn't have to pay to cover the ransom or the cost of the goods or the vessel.

2. The company that owns the vessel and/or the company contracting for the shipment of goods doesn't want an escalation of violence that could result in destruction of the vessel and/or cargo.

i.e. the "grab your ankles" policy.

I think the entire mission to save that captain should be paid for the company contracting that vessel.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.