An interesting post on why the bailout vote failed...
From fivethirtyeight.com:
This was predictable, I suppose, but it's remarkable to see how strong a relationship there is between today's failed vote on the bailout and the competitive nature of different House races. Among 38 incumbent congressmen in races rated as "toss-up" or "lean" by Swing State Project, just 8 voted for the bailout as opposed to 30 against: a batting average of .211. By comparison, the vote among congressmen who don't have as much to worry about was essentially even: 197 for, 198 against. A complete breakdown follows below the fold. REPUBLICANS AK-AL Young R NAY CO-4 Musgrave R NAY CT-4 Shays R YEA FL-8 Keller R NAY FL-21 L Diaz-Balart R NAY FL-24 Feeney R NAY FL-25 M Diaz-Balart R NAY ID-1 Sali R NAY IL-10 Kirk R YEA MI-7 Walberg R NAY MI-9 Knollenberg R NAY MO-6 Graves R NAY NC-8 Hayes R NAY NV-3 Porter R YEA NY-29 Kuhl R NAY OH-1 Chabot R NAY OH-2 Schmidt R NAY PA-3 English R NAY VA-2 Drake R NAY WA-8 Reichert R NAY VULNERABLE GOP = 3 YEAS, 17 NAYS (15%) OTHER GOP = 62 YEAS, 116 NAYS (35%) DEMOCRATS AZ-5 Mitchell D NAY AZ-8 Giffords D NAY CA-11 McNerney D YEA FL-16 Mahoney D YEA GA-8 Marshall D YEA IL-14 Foster D YEA IN-9 Hill D NAY KS-2 Boyda D NAY KY-3 Yarmuth D NAY LA-6 Cazayoux D NAY MS-1 Childers D NAY NH-1 Shea-Porter D NAY NY-20 Gillibrand D NAY PA-4 Altmire D NAY PA-10 Carney D NAY PA-11 Kanjorski D YEA TX-22 Lampson D NAY WI-8 Kagen D NAY VULNERABLE DEMS = 5 YEAS, 13 NAYS (28%) OTHER DEMS = 135 YEAS, 82 NAYS (62%) ALL VULNERABLES = 8 YEAS, 30 NAYS (21%) OTHERS = 197 YEAS, 198 NAYS (50%) UPDATE: A helpful reader named Matt Glassman passed along the fact that, among 26 congressmen NOT running for re-election (almost all of whom are Republicans), 23 voted in favor of the bill, as opposed to 2 against and one abstaining. EDIT (4:24 PM): The count above may not be exact -- Eve Fairbanks finds 4 retiring Republicans who voted against the bill -- but the general point should stand. |
Quote:
Chris Cannon (my rep) was one of those losers. |
Quote:
Why do you yearn for an inside the beltway and Wall Street deal, anti-democratic and partial? Because you're a liberal democrat? |
Vote the bastards out!
|
I'm really not sure why this is interesting, either. Seems like a no-brainer.
|
Quote:
1. they are owned by the rich and powerful 2. they occasionally have to go against the rich and powerful to hold their positions This answers every action in this vote. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You guys just don't get it, do you? |
Quote:
We all know you love Obama because he possesses all the Gifts of the Spirit, but don't be so surprised when some folks expect their representatives to represent them. |
Quote:
The two great points of difference between a democracy and a republic are: first, the delegation of the government, in the latter, to a small number of citizens elected by the rest; secondly, the greater number of citizens, and greater sphere of country, over which the latter may be extended. The effect of the first difference is, on the one hand, to refine and enlarge the public views, by passing them through the medium of a chosen body of citizens, whose wisdom may best discern the true interest of their country, and whose patriotism and love of justice will be least likely to sacrifice it to temporary or partial considerations. Under such a regulation, it may well happen that the public voice, pronounced by the representatives of the people, will be more consonant to the public good than if pronounced by the people themselves, convened for the purpose |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:21 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.