UtahDan |
01-23-2008 06:05 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea
(Post 177159)
You would experience a huge human cost. And let's point out that we as a society apparently demand and benefit from their presence here. If there were no motivation for their cheap services, would employers continue to persue them?
We have large sections of the construction industry and agriculture which depend upon these workers. We need a sensible way of determining how many, and amnesty for those here who have been here and given birth to children who know no other country, and then sensible border control. But ejecting 12 million undocumenteds is not feasible or humane.
|
This is all true but I think the slippery slope argument is apparent. Lets say we give them amnesty and adopt a much broader, more expansive guest worker program that in the future lets 10x as many people in. Those who don't qualify as guest workers are still going to flood across the border because they know one day they will get amnesty too.
The point is that no matter how you reform immigration policy, if you don't penalize the law breakers you might well not have a policy because it will be ignored.
Now I do think there is force to the argument that it is hard to round up 12 million people. Okay I agree its hard. But if we were talking about 12 million terrorists we would find the will and the resources. I am not saying that it is remotely the same, just pointing out that it is not impossible.
I would even be happy with true amnesty if the same day a wall went up and any new illegals were aggressively sought out and deported. There HAS to be an enhanced enforcement component to what we do, even it if it is only going forward. Otherwise, we might as well just dissolve INS and open up our borders. That isn't hyperbole, I don't think. I don't think a carrot exists that will keep illegals out. It has to be a stick.
|