MikeWaters |
08-02-2009 03:37 AM |
79 weeks PTO
wouldn't that be nice?
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/02/us...y.html?_r=1&hp
No doubt, the democrats are going to say that 79 weeks is not long enough, and it must be extended to 150 weeks.
Hell, let's make it a lifetime benefit.
No wonder this country is circling the drain.
Quote:
Ms. Lampley, 40, who is married with three children, lost her job as a human resources officer in January 2008 and had been receiving $351 a week, which covered the groceries and gas. Even so, she and her husband, who still has work as a machinist, were sinking into debt. Now, still poorer, she feels devastated because they cannot buy their son a laptop to take to college and she cannot give her 9-year-old son money for the movies.
|
Is this the criteria these days for tragedy? Are we going to have a new Steinbeck who will tell the tale of families who cannot afford laptops for their children? Or who must buy PCs instead of Macs?!!!!
|