cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board

cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board (http://www.cougarguard.com/forum/index.php)
-   Professional Sports (http://www.cougarguard.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Real Salt Lake stadium deal dead? (http://www.cougarguard.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6243)

Cali Coug 01-28-2007 10:57 PM

Real Salt Lake stadium deal dead?
 
The Debt Review Committee said they don't believe RSL is a viable organization and, therefore, funding the stadium is a bad idea.

I sincerely hope this isn't the end of the road for RSL and their quest for a stadium. The city is losing a lot without RSL getting its stadium.

SLC may lose a lot, too. If RSL gets the Sandy stadium, downtown SLC will get an arts district (which it DESPERATELY needs). I have a hard time believing that RSL is not viable. I also have a hard time believing they can only book 6 concerts per YEAR at a new stadium (as the Debt Review Committee claimed). That would be one concert every 9 weeks, on average. If it is a nice venue, it should do much better than that.

I am hoping Caroon goes against the Debt Review Committee and supports the stadium. It will bring in a ton of tax dollars, revitalize that area in Sandy, and bring an arts district to downtown SLC.

Surfah 01-28-2007 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cali Coug (Post 56854)
The Debt Review Committee said they don't believe RSL is a viable organization and, therefore, funding the stadium is a bad idea.

I sincerely hope this isn't the end of the road for RSL and their quest for a stadium. The city is losing a lot without RSL getting its stadium.

SLC may lose a lot, too. If RSL gets the Sandy stadium, downtown SLC will get an arts district (which it DESPERATELY needs). I have a hard time believing that RSL is not viable. I also have a hard time believing they can only book 6 concerts per YEAR at a new stadium (as the Debt Review Committee claimed). That would be one concert every 9 weeks, on average. If it is a nice venue, it should do much better than that.

I am hoping Caroon goes against the Debt Review Committee and supports the stadium. It will bring in a ton of tax dollars, revitalize that area in Sandy, and bring an arts district to downtown SLC.

I don't think RSL is viable. I don't think the MLS is viable though either. As far as concerts go I think that's a reasonable number for them to expect. How many shows does USANA Ampiheatre book a year? As an outdoor venue in Utah you're limited as it is with Fall and Winter.

RockyBalboa 01-28-2007 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by surfah33 (Post 56861)
I don't think RSL is viable. I don't think the MLS is viable though either. As far as concerts go I think that's a reasonable number for them to expect. How many shows does USANA Ampiheatre book a year? As an outdoor venue in Utah you're limited as it is with Fall and Winter.

Not too mention there are lots of other concert venues during those months to compete against.

E-Center, Delta Center, Usana Amphitheater, McKay Events Center, Dee Events Center, not to mention the umpteenth other Amphitheaters around the state. I saw Ryan Shupe & the Rubberband at the Sandy Amphitheater last year.

I hope RSL can stay, but I won't be sad if they leave.

cougjunkie 01-28-2007 11:58 PM

It is not officially dead, the Salt Lake County Mayor has the final say now. I guess it depends on what will get him re-elected.

Surfah 02-02-2007 05:30 PM

This deal is dead. Geneva site being considered now if Checketts will sell to Anderson Geneva. That may be the only way to keep RSL in Utah.

il Padrino Ute 02-02-2007 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by surfah33 (Post 58258)
This deal is dead. Geneva site being considered now if Checketts will sell to Anderson Geneva. That may be the only way to keep RSL in Utah.

Yep, it's dead. My understanding is that there is a group or individual in St. Louis that is interested in buying RSL.

Cali Coug 02-02-2007 05:54 PM

According to the Trib this morning, some group in St Louis is working hard to get the team moved there, but the legislature is now contemplating funding the stadium directly. I hope the latter happens and the team stays.

Surfah 02-02-2007 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by il Padrino Ute (Post 58272)
Yep, it's dead. My understanding is that there is a group or individual in St. Louis that is interested in buying RSL.

If I were Checketts I'd sell. He purchased it for only $10 million. He could make $5-10 million on the sale I am sure. DC United sold for $33 million. Bigger market and championships but still, there is money to be made for sure if he wants.

Surfah 02-02-2007 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cali Coug (Post 58290)
According to the Trib this morning, some group in St Louis is working hard to get the team moved there, but the legislature is now contemplating funding the stadium directly. I hope the latter happens and the team stays.

I thought that the legislature was only pushing that if Checketts wanted it and as of Tuesday Checketts didn't want to go that route. Was this part of the hotel tax issue?

I know the owner of Anderson Geneva was trying to contact Checketts people without any answer. He was quoted as having the money and land to make it work. I don't know that Checketts would sell locally though.

Cali Coug 02-02-2007 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by surfah33 (Post 58296)
I thought that the legislature was only pushing that if Checketts wanted it and as of Tuesday Checketts didn't want to go that route. Was this part of the hotel tax issue?

I know the owner of Anderson Geneva was trying to contact Checketts people without any answer. He was quoted as having the money and land to make it work. I don't know that Checketts would sell locally though.

According to both the Trib and the D-News today, it is a very real possibility.


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.