Originally Posted by SteelBlue

I totally disagree fus. And what's more, they have openly mocked our beliefs. They had Joseph Smith with a seerstone in a hat for goodness sake. I certainly don't feel the need to back Cruise on this at all.

Originally Posted by All-American

I guess you wouldn't feel the need to back David Whitmer, either:

“Joseph Smith would put the seer stone into a hat, and put his face in the hat, drawing it closely around his face to exclude the light; and in the darkness the spiritual light would shine. A piece of something resembling parchment would appear, and on that appeared the writing. One character at a time would appear, and under it was the interpretation in English. Brother Joseph would read off the English to Oliver Cowdery, who was his principal scribe, and when it was written down and repeated to Brother Joseph to see if it was correct, then it would disappear, and another character with the interpretation would appear. Thus the Book of Mormon was translated by the gift and power of God, and not by any power of man.” (David Whitmer, An Address to All Believers in Christ, Richmond, Mo.: n.p., 1887, p. 12.)"

Originally Posted by All-American

I guess you wouldn't feel the need to back David Whitmer, either:

“Joseph Smith would put the seer stone into a hat, and put his face in the hat, drawing it closely around his face to exclude the light; and in the darkness the spiritual light would shine. A piece of something resembling parchment would appear, and on that appeared the writing. One character at a time would appear, and under it was the interpretation in English. Brother Joseph would read off the English to Oliver Cowdery, who was his principal scribe, and when it was written down and repeated to Brother Joseph to see if it was correct, then it would disappear, and another character with the interpretation would appear. Thus the Book of Mormon was translated by the gift and power of God, and not by any power of man.” (David Whitmer, An Address to All Believers in Christ, Richmond, Mo.: n.p., 1887, p. 12.)"

Originally Posted by SteelBlue

Not sure what your point is here AA. If it is to show me that the seerstone in the hat is true you're talking to the wrong guy. I'm well aware of it, and I'd hope that you'd know that about me by now. I'm simply making the point that South Park mocked many of our beliefs and our history. I didn't see us financially boycotting anything. We take it in stride and move on. I still don't feel sorry for cruise and I wasn't personally offended by any South Park episode.

Originally Posted by JohnnyLingo

South Park HAS aired an episode degenerating Mormons